Blog top | Forums top | DreamLover Labs Main site | DL Lounge
Register | Login




Shop for male chastity devices and other training tools through this link to support us.


New stuff:

2024-06-06
I love the idea of making cert...
by jcoldstream
2024-03-28
Email confirmations after comp...
by switch95forfun
2024-03-28
Email confirmations after comp...
by switch95forfun
2023-12-01
Emails not received
by DreamLover Labs
2023-08-17
My husband needs to have a DL ...
by jcoldstream
2023-08-17
Can you shower or get the DL20...
by chastitydomme
2023-08-17
Where can I find other people ...
by ahsdfjklhfw
2023-08-17
I would also like to hear from...
by jcoldstream
2023-04-14
If you have soldering skills y...
by honeypod
2023-04-14
I love it...
by sissymaidemily
2023-02-20
I also have been able to get m...
by bdsamm
2022-11-05
Closed or opened Indication fo...
by switch95forfun
2022-11-04
I get mine at a Batteriesplus ...
by Fuseldar
2022-10-05
Battery suppliers
by DreamLover Labs
2022-07-25
System appears to be stable
by DreamLover Labs
2022-07-23
I've been experiencing this is...
by mayasblade
2022-07-23
Diagnosing network issues
by DreamLover Labs
2022-07-23
I'm facing the same problem...
by P4Palkkz
2022-07-20
Please email support with all ...
by dreamloverlabs
2022-06-26
Connection issues? Download the updated Windows app
by DreamLover Labs
2022-06-24
Server down...
by Alex2012
2022-06-24
Please download the updated Wi...
by dreamloverlabs
2022-06-24
Please download the updated Wi...
by dreamloverlabs
2022-06-24
I have tried several times to ...
by nikki.smith
2022-06-24
Login Response Unsuccessful...
by SlaveofDesire86
2021-11-05
Mistress Keyholder Rules the W...
by mistresskeyholder
2021-10-22
Widget not working...
by slavejake
2021-09-03
Giving back the Temp Ownership...
by keyholder0734
2021-08-24
What do you say guys shall we ...
by dreamloverlabs
2021-08-24
Hybrid solar systems...
by unipu2009
2020-12-10
Battery passivation
by DreamLover Labs
2019-09-02
Footage of DL2000 in use
by DreamLover Labs
2019-03-31
Hi, I am looking for a keyhold...
by dreamlover12
2019-01-20
Product questions
by DreamLover Labs
2018-07-29
Pay using cryptocurrencies
by DreamLover Labs
2018-07-08
Behind Barz + DreamLover 2000
by DreamLover Labs
<< return to blog entries

Privacy of sessions

2010-10-17 09:57:01 (5014 views)

An issue has emerged regarding the privacy of management sessions.
The current client-server infrastructure enables multiple administrators to manage a male at the same time. Should this be allowed? Prevented? Should administrators be able to view who else is managing the male? Should they also see who is sending what commands?

Comments

By akw123 at 2010-10-17 12:32:03 Reply
I would imagine that the simplest implementation would be to log which administrator sent the command. Also providing a list of administrators controlling a male would help facilitate everyone that has control.
The real question that begs to be answered; What is the range we are dealing with? Could or would this really happen? (odds?) And what would be your answer if this situation did occur? Is there a fix?
By sissy_maid_melody at 2010-10-17 12:37:56 Reply
From my own perspective I know that my Mistress would be very unhappy if there was anyone else but Her as administrator of me. In fact I think she'd use up the batteries in punishment mode if that ever happened.

Restricting administrators to one is fine for specific relationships but I can see why some might operate as a group and have many administrators in charge of many devices.

I think you may already have the solution. You added the "device owner" mode so that an owner could withdraw the rights of an administrator to the device. You could slightly extend this. Perhaps the device owner can set a value saying if the device should be restricted to a single or multiple owners.

The administrator would be able to see if they are the only administrator of the device. As for multiple owners, some device owners may be happy for all administrators to see who the others are. On the other hand there could be a privacy mode where although an administrator knows they not the one controlling the device, they do not know who the others are.
By sub3604 at 2010-10-17 13:27:48 Reply
Why not simply allow the owner to see everything and decide if administrators can see each other that is if you are still going to use the owner, administrator and male in the software.

By fgordon at 2010-10-17 15:04:46 Reply
I think web application security rules apply here quite well. So, each device should have:

- the owner of the device (or super administrator)
- users
- groups (the "male administrators" would be such a group)
- actions or activities (i.e. things that can be done with the device and the software)

Each user or group can be allowed certain actions by the administrator like, but not limited to, specific zaps or arousals. Two of these actions could be for logging: seeing the log of one's own commands and seeing the log of others.

This way, the owner/super admin can customize the application in any way she/he wants.
By fgordon at 2010-10-17 15:06:56 Reply
In my post above, I said:
"Each user or group can be allowed certain actions by the *administrator*..."

By *administrator* I meant the owner/super-administrator.
Post new comment
(C) 2008-2016 DreamLover Laboratories - all rights reserved