Blog top | Forums top | DreamLover Labs Main site | DL Lounge
Register | Login




Shop for male chastity devices and other training tools through this link to support us.


New stuff:

2025-02-02
Once again
by DreamLover Labs
2025-02-02
Search for battery welder...
by dreamloverlabs
2025-02-01
When I click on that link temu...
by treasure
2025-01-30
Email fixed once again
by DreamLover Labs
2025-01-19
Creating your own battery packs
by DreamLover Labs
2024-11-29
Converting the app
by DreamLover Labs
2023-12-01
Emails not received
by DreamLover Labs
2023-08-17
Can you shower or get the DL20...
by chastitydomme
2023-08-17
I would also like to hear from...
by jcoldstream
2023-08-17
Where can I find other people ...
by ahsdfjklhfw
2023-08-17
My husband needs to have a DL ...
by jcoldstream
2023-04-14
I love it...
by sissymaidemily
2022-11-05
Closed or opened Indication fo...
by switch95forfun
2022-10-05
Battery suppliers
by DreamLover Labs
2022-07-25
System appears to be stable
by DreamLover Labs
2022-07-23
Diagnosing network issues
by DreamLover Labs
2022-06-26
Connection issues? Download the updated Windows app
by DreamLover Labs
2022-06-24
Server down...
by Alex2012
2022-06-24
Please download the updated Wi...
by dreamloverlabs
2022-06-24
I have tried several times to ...
by nikki.smith
2022-06-24
Login Response Unsuccessful...
by SlaveofDesire86
2021-11-05
Mistress Keyholder Rules the W...
by mistresskeyholder
2021-10-22
Widget not working...
by slavejake
2021-09-03
Giving back the Temp Ownership...
by keyholder0734
2021-08-24
Hybrid solar systems...
by unipu2009
2021-08-24
What do you say guys shall we ...
by dreamloverlabs
2020-12-10
Battery passivation
by DreamLover Labs
2019-03-31
Hi, I am looking for a keyhold...
by dreamlover12
<< return to blog entries

DL2000 goes through airport security.... again

2010-09-03 06:15:13 (4485 views)

We're glad to announce that even first world metal detectors (Seoul, Korea) did NOT pick up the receiver.

This time the receiver went through the "door" type metal detector without metallic electrodes. Hand scanners were not used.

Metallic electrodes were NOT attached to the device for this test (though the metallic PCB, cables and ring terminals were included). The reason for this is that we wanted to first ascertain whether the main components will set off the detectors.

The electrodes are the bulkiest metallic part, but if they are problematic they are entirely replaceable. Next time we will mount the electrodes too and try again.

Comments

By johnsteed at 2010-09-03 10:33:01 Reply
Dude, you have balls of steel to risk getting flagged by the metal detector wearing that. I mean, the end result would likely be a private room for a visual inspection, because you'd set off the wand as well. Quite humiliating.

Well, not balls of steel, I guess. *That* would set off the metal detector. :)
By akw123 at 2010-09-03 12:58:33 Reply
All this talk about going through airport security may in fact create a false sense of safety for the user. I'm not sure I want to deal with airport security over wearing a device that sets off the metal detector then in turn sets off the hand held wand which requires a "private" meeting with security agents. Even if you can explain the device, they may not want to take a chance and let you board the aircraft. In the long run you may wind up missing your flight.
Post new comment
(C) 2008-2016 DreamLover Laboratories - all rights reserved