The response you wrote seems entirely appropriate and right. Obviously, over time, the male should learn the benefits of being more compliant and willing to follow his Woman's direction without the need for excess training. At some point, I believe the line between consensual and non-consensual is blurred when the male "believes" he has no choice but to agree with his owner's goals and dreams.
"However, ensuring contact is quite easy. Tie a very thin sewing thread or wool thread around the scrotum and the electrode. This is comfortable, doesn't come off spontaneously, and makes the device 100% tamper evident."
This would seem to be a good idea but a tamper evident numbered tie doing the same job would work better as long as it was unable to get any tighter on it's own anyway .Such items can normally be found on ebay
While it's understood that this whole scenario is consensual, I think it's a mistake to assume that the device's security (or lack thereof) should be completely ignored. If everything about this is "willful cooperation", then why even have a chastity device to begin with? Obviously, there is a strong desire on the part of many people to have a chastity device, and by extension, the DLL device, that is inescapable, or at least very difficult to escape, without alerting the keyholder.
Of course, it would be futile to spend a great deal of time and effort to make the DLL device completely secure, and I'm not suggesting that. However, at least a little attention could be spared to try to make it as secure as the chastity device itself. To totally ignore an issue as basic and important as the device's security, while devoting a great deal of time a lot of esoteric features that only a very few will care about, is pretty illogical, in my opinion.
We're not going back to the design stage with this version of the product. If we seem to be adding things as we go along it's because they are very simple to implement (ex. the PC remote) and because we've got some spare time waiting for parts and manufacturing; not because we're in "add features" mode and have allocated time to peripheral goodies.
The product is complete and it increases the security of the CB type devices slightly through the possibility of adding a waist band and the fact it keeps the CB tight against the abdomen. You can even increase security more by making better waist bands, for instance adding a lock.
If you have your own ideas about security and think that you can increase the security of the whole assembly without needing a completely new chastity system feel free to let us know.
Is there any chance that a future revision of the product will be more security oriented? Tamper-evident is only pertinent is you have someone else to report to and I feel like there are a lot of men that are interested in your product don't have a key holder.
